ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
An Academics Guide to Approaching Bioscience Curricula Design: Stakeholders, Material and Assessment Choice, and Employability.
Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Academics Guide to Approaching Bioscience Curricula Design: Stakeholders, Material and Assessment Choice, and Employability.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ultimate aim of all higher education programs is to produce work-ready graduates who can enter a number of career paths. Bioscience graduates are well suited to a multitude of career paths such as research, education or industry. Designing an undergraduate bioscience program that can prepare learners for this multitude of career pathways can be a challenge. Curricula design is a substantive piece of work that is often given to subject specialists who are very familiar with biological science as a subject, but perhaps less well versed in the underpinning pedagogical principles of teaching, learning and assessment. Academics can be left to design curricula alongside their existing teaching, research and administrative duties which leaves little time for thorough research into the theory behind the design process, and how this can be conducted to ensure a focus on employability as well as scientific proficiency. This article aims to provide a "how to" guide for academics who are engaged in designing or redesigning biological science curricula, and is based on experiences of redesigning a Biomedical Science undergraduate degree. It provides an overview of the key considerations to make in the overarching structure of the program, the needs of learners, employers and accrediting bodies, the theory underpinning the comparative strengths and weaknesses of different learning delivery and assessment strategies, and how these can all coalesce to provide a biological curriculum that encourages and enhances diverse postgraduation careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.