Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230527›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2025

Tunneled flaps reconstruction after facial tumor resection: Retrospective study and new forehead flap.

Giuseppe Consorti, Giulio Cirignaco, Lisa Catarzi, Mariagrazia Paglianiti, Enrico Betti, Umberto Committeri, Paolo Balercia, Alberto Bianchi, Gabriele Monarchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe ConsortiDepartment of Clinical Specialistic and Dental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Tronto 10/A, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Giulio CirignacoDepartment of medicine, Section of maxillo-facial surgery, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, Siena, Italy.
Lisa CatarziDepartment of medicine, Section of maxillo-facial surgery, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, Siena, Italy.
Mariagrazia PaglianitiDepartment of medicine, Section of maxillo-facial surgery, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, Siena, Italy.
Enrico BettiDivision of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, Marche University Hospitals- Umberto I, Via Conca 71, Ancona, Italy.
Umberto CommitteriMaxillofacial Surgery, Santa Maria Hospital, Unit, V.le Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Paolo BalerciaDivision of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, Marche University Hospitals- Umberto I, Via Conca 71, Ancona, Italy.
Alberto BianchiMaxillo Facial Surgery Unit, CHIRMED Department, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy.
Gabriele MonarchiDepartment of medicine, Section of maxillo-facial surgery, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical defects of the face resulting from the removal of skin tumors can present significant challenges, particularly when reconstructive methods aim to maintain the integrity of the facial anatomical units. The face is divided into specific aesthetic units, each characterized by skin with uniform features such as thickness, subcutaneous tissue, and adhesion to underlying structures. Material and methods: From 2014 to 2024, 24 patients were treated with tunneled flaps for facial defects due skin tumors at the Maxillofacial Surgery department, University Hospital of Ancona, Italy. Results: In a study of 24 patients (15 males, 9 females; mean age 73), only 5 had a history of malignant facial skin tumors, with 3 presenting due to local recurrence. Lesions ranged in size from 19 × 15 mm to 30 × 24 mm. 10 patients had disease at the eyelid level and 14 at the nose level. The most common diagnosis was basal cell carcinoma (15 cases), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (7 cases) and Merkel cell carcinoma (2 cases). No lymph node or distant metastases were detected preoperatively. All patients had good or very good cosmetic outcomes, with no complications or recurrences observed during follow-up. No complication was observed. Conclusion: The tunneled pedicled flap is an excellent choice for reconstructing upper eyelid and nasal defects. This technique is easy to manage, can be completed in a single stage with satisfactory outcomes, and effectively hides donor site scars along natural facial lines. Moreover, it maintains facial symmetry and can be performed under local anesthesia, with or without sedation.

Indexed as

Facial aesthetic subunitsFacial reconstructionMaxillofacial surgerySkin tumorsTunneled flap

Identifiers

PMID41230527
PMCPMC12603690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.