Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230522›Full record

ArticleACS catalysis2025

Boron-Induced Electronic Modulation and Nanocrystal Fragmentation Synergistically Boost Photocatalytic Water Oxidation in Ionic Carbon Nitrides.

Haijian Tong, Valentin Diez-Cabanes, Yuanxing Fang, Guillaume Maurin, Markus Antonietti, Christian Mark Pelicano

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Activating Ionic Carbon Nitrides via Epitaxial Dyadic Coupling for Efficient Solar-Driven HAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. NHAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering Polyheptazine and Polytriazine Imides for Photocatalysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haijian TongDepartment of Colloid Chemistry, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam 14476, Germany.
Valentin Diez-CabanesICGM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier 34293, France.
Yuanxing FangState Key Laboratory of Chemistry for NBC Hazards Protection, College of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7603-5531
Guillaume MaurinICGM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier 34293, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2096-0450
Markus AntoniettiDepartment of Colloid Chemistry, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam 14476, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8395-7558
Christian Mark PelicanoDepartment of Colloid Chemistry, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam 14476, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4119-2523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photocatalytic water oxidation is a critical half-reaction to realize overall water splitting, yet it remains challenging due to sluggish reaction kinetics and the need for efficient active centers. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a dual strategy combining boron doping with nanocrystal fragmentation to boost the photocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance of ionic carbon nitrides. The optimal catalyst (

Indexed as

boron dopingionic carbon nitridesnanostructure engineeringoxygen evolutionphotocatalytic water oxidation

Identifiers

PMID41230522
PMCPMC12603997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.