ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Bridging the service gap in cognitive behavioral therapy from a user perspective: Findings from a web-based survey in Japan.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the service gap in cognitive behavioral therapy from a user perspective: Findings from a web-based survey in Japan.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The primary aim was to quantify public awareness, experience, and delivery‑format preferences regarding cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in Japan. The secondary aim was to identify user‑related factors associated with CBT literacy (awareness or experience), including information-seeking behavior and prior service use. Methods: A cross‑sectional web survey of 518 Japanese residents aged 15-79 years was conducted in August 2024. Awareness and experience of CBT, preferred delivery formats, mental‑health service use, mindfulness recognition, and Certified Public Psychologist (CPP) awareness were assessed. A binary logistic regression examined factors linked to CBT awareness/experience. Results: Only 13.1% of respondents reported awareness of or experience with CBT, while 62.2% had never heard of it. Face-to-face CBT with physicians was preferred by 59.3%, compared with 8.9% favoring application‑based delivery. Awareness of mindfulness (odds ratio [OR] = 13.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.83-27.40), CPP awareness (OR = 5.48, 2.48-12.10), and past mental‑health service use (OR = 3.17, 1.52-6.58) were independently associated with CBT literacy; age, gender, and self‑rated mental health were not significantly associated factors. Conclusion: Public awareness of CBT in Japan remains limited despite more than a decade of insurance coverage. Engagement with mental-health services, exposure to mindfulness concepts, and familiarity with CPPs appear to be associated with greater CBT literacy. Most users prefer face-to-face delivery, suggesting eed to expand trained providers while gradually integrating digital options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.