ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Cross-modal impact of auditory experience on visual cortical entrainment in children who are hard-of-hearing.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-modal neuroplasticity is a well-studied phenomenon whereby in the absence of sensory input (e.g., in individuals who are deaf or blind), the sensory cortices of the affected modality are "taken over" by the unaffected sensory systems. This neuroplasticity is often coupled with changes in the dynamics of the unaffected primary sensory cortices themselves. Nonetheless, whether these cross-modal changes extend to those with mild-to-severe sensory loss where sensory input is degraded but not absent, as is the case for children who are hard-of-hearing (CHH), remains poorly understood. Visual entrainment, sometimes referred to as the visual steady-state response, is the process by which the primary visual cortices entrain to the frequency of a rhythmic exogenous visual stimulus. Importantly, visual entrainment dynamics are thought to serve as an important proxy for how visual stimuli are processed in the brain. The current study sought to identify the impact of mild-to-severe hearing loss and individual differences in auditory experience on visual entrainment dynamics in youth. To this end, CHH and an age- and sex-matched group of children with normal hearing (CNH) were presented with a visual entrainment stimulus that flickered at 15 Hz during magnetoencephalography. Neural responses to the fundamental (15 Hz) and first harmonic (30 Hz) were imaged using beamforming, and the power envelope of the peak responses was extracted as a function of time and submitted to linear mixed effects modeling. We found a significant group-by-time interaction, whereby CHH exhibited a stronger increase in power during entrainment than CNH, suggesting altered entrainment dynamics. We also ran whole-brain correlations between 15 and 30 Hz neural responses and hearing aid use in CHH, controlling for degree of hearing loss. We found a significant negative relationship between hearing aid use and activity in the left primary auditory cortex and left lateral parietal cortex, such that CHH who consistently wore their hearing aids showed the smallest amount of cross-modal neuroplasticity in these regions. Crucially, reductions in cross-modal neuroplasticity in the left lateral parietal cortex were related to better verbal outcomes. These data provide important new information regarding how consistent auditory experience may serve to normalize the neural dynamics serving sensory processing, and how these changes may cascade into improvements in verbal ability in CHH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.