ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Machine learning-based reconstruction of 2D MRI for quantitative morphometry in epilepsy.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural neuroimaging analyses require "research quality" images, procured with costly MRI acquisitions. Isotropic (3D-T1) images are desirable for quantitative analyses, however, a routine compromise in the clinical setting is to acquire anisotropic (2D-T1) analogues for qualitative visual inspection. ML (machine learning-based) software have shown promise in addressing some of the limitations of 2D-T1 scans in research applications, yet their efficacy in quantitative research is generally poorly understood. Quantitative morphometric analyses have previously identified pathology-related abnormalities of the subcortical structures in idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE), which have been overlooked based on visual inspection. As such, IGE biomarkers present a suitable model in which to evaluate the applicability of image preprocessing methods. This study, therefore, explores subcortical structural biomarkers of IGE, first in our "silver standard" 3D-T1 scans, then in 2D-T1 scans that were either untransformed, resampled using a classical interpolation approach, or synthesised with a resolution and contrast agnostic ML model. 2D-T1 and 3D-T1 MRI scans were acquired during the same scanning session for 33 individuals with drug-sensitive IGE (age
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.