ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Brain activation during cognitive control tasks differs substantially between people but is reliable within individuals.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conflict adaptation in a confound-minimized face-word Stroop task: exploring the potential settings of an fMRI-related experiment.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neural organization of cognitive control has been extensively studied using neuroimaging methods, but this organization is still not well understood. We argue that two factors may have contributed to this elusiveness. First, most previous research has relied on group-averaged results, which may provide a misleading representation of individual brains. Second, most fMRI studies study the brain only under a limited number of conditions, making it challenging to provide fine-grained distinctions in the functions associated with specific regions. Recent precision neuroimaging approaches have demonstrated substantial promise in furthering understanding of the human brain through repeated sampling of individual participants. However, most precision imaging work still relies on resting-state fMRI or a small number of tasks. In the present study, we demonstrate the utility of a novel dense imaging approach, which combines precision neuroimaging with an unusually large task battery. We demonstrate that patterns of neural activity associated with cognitive control tasks are significantly more similar within-person than between people, even after controlling for anatomical similarity, suggesting that these patterns are person-specific and reliable. In addition, we demonstrate that within-person and between-person similarity changes significantly across tasks, suggesting that some tasks may be more suited for exploring individual differences in cognitive control than others. Together, our findings highlight the potential value of a precision approach and the benefit of using a large number of tasks to further understanding of cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.