ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Some Additional Curiosity About When Adaptation to Developmental Adversity Becomes a Trauma.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuing the Conversation for a Clinical Conceptualization of Attachment Trauma.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of attachment trauma is provocative and stimulates an effort to seek additional definitions of trauma that are more congenial toward understanding the mental injury occurring to a particular individual rather than to a broad population where the focus is on "the size of the bang." What really constitutes an experience of trauma? When does the normative adaptation to adversity that is part of the infant attachment paradigm cross over the line and become attachment trauma? Are there biological considerations in this kind of event or are there only psychodynamic considerations, relational activities? In this brief communication these questions are explored in relation to a multiple self-state psychology of mind that is consistent with Bowlby's exploration of segregated subsystems, detachment, and deactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.