ArticleCureus2025
Association Between Resident Physicians' Self-Rated Patient Care Ownership and Medical Professionalism Assessed by Patients: A Single-Center Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Patient care ownership (PCO) has received substantial attention as a core aspect of medical professionalism. In recent years, a quantitative PCO Scale (PCOS) has been developed and widely utilized. Despite its growing importance, PCOS is measured through resident physician self-assessment, and the association between PCOS scores and resident evaluation by patients, the primary stakeholders in clinical care, remains underexamined. Methods This study was conducted at a rural postgraduate clinical training hospital in Japan from July 2022 to March 2023. PCO was assessed using the Japanese version of the PCOS (J-PCOS) as the explanatory variable. Patient-reported medical professionalism was measured using the Japanese version of the Instrument for Patient Assessment of Medical Professionalism (J-IPAMP) as the outcome variable. A linear mixed-effects model was employed to adjust for clustering within residents and individual covariates. Results Twelve residents and 99 of their patients were included in the analysis. After adjusting for potential confounders and clustering within physicians, J-PCOS scores were not associated with J-IPAMP scores. Conclusions Residents' self-rated PCO was not associated with patient-reported professionalism. This may be because patients cannot observe key aspects of PCO, such as interprofessional communication and decision-making, and instead evaluate professionalism based on visible behaviors, such as bedside manner. Differences in priorities, with patients focusing on relational aspects of care while physicians emphasize systemic responsibilities and outcomes, may also contribute to this disconnect. Future studies should employ a multicenter design in Japan and conduct analogous surveys internationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.