Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230302›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Performance of FDA-Approved AI Algorithms in Detecting Acute Pulmonary Embolism on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA): A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Retrospective Studies.

Ethan X DePry, Viren Parmar, Saahas Rajendran, Victor Milev, Mukul Anand, Manik Anand, Sarabjeet Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ethan X DePryMedicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Viren ParmarMedicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Saahas RajendranMedicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Victor MilevMedicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Mukul AnandStatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Manik AnandResearch, Pepperdine University, Malibu, USA.
Sarabjeet SinghCardiology, Bakersfield Heart Hospital, Bakersfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition requiring prompt and accurate diagnosis. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for PE detection, but its interpretation is time-intensive and subject to human error. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, offer promising tools to enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of FDA-approved ML algorithms for detecting acute PE on CTPA. A comprehensive literature search across six databases identified six retrospective studies encompassing 9,102 CTPA scans, all of which assessed either the Aidoc or CINA-PE algorithms. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI: 88%-95%) and 98% (95% CI: 93%-100%), respectively, indicating high diagnostic accuracy across real-world datasets. All included studies demonstrated low risk of bias according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) assessments. These findings support the integration of FDA-approved ML tools into radiological workflows as adjuncts to reduce diagnostic errors and improve triage. However, prospective trials are needed to assess their impact on clinical decision-making, workflow efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

acute pulmonary embolismai and machine learningaidocartificial intelligencect pulmonary angiogram (ctpa)deep learning artificial intelligencemachine learningpulmonary ct angiographypulmonary embolism (pe)

Identifiers

PMID41230302
PMCPMC12604435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.