ReviewCureus2025
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Orthopedic Patients Taking Clopidogrel: A Focused Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative antiplatelet management in CAD patients undergoing spinal fusion: balancing cardiovascular safety and bleeding risk.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopedic surgeons frequently manage patients taking clopidogrel who require low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for venous thromboprophylaxis. This review examines the differences between arterial and venous thrombosis and explains why both medications are often necessary despite the increased bleeding risk. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to August 2025, screening 1,184 records and ultimately including 57 studies comprising eight randomized controlled trials, 32 cohort studies, and 17 systematic reviews. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study populations, interventions, and outcome definitions, we conducted structured narrative synthesis rather than meta-analysis. We provide clear guidance on when to stop or continue clopidogrel therapy in elective versus trauma surgery and how to safely combine it with LMWH when needed. Key recommendations include that clopidogrel alone does not prevent venous thromboembolism, LMWH remains necessary in immobilized patients, elective surgery usually requires the temporary cessation of clopidogrel, and trauma surgery should not be delayed despite ongoing therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.