Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230281›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Orthopedic Patients Taking Clopidogrel: A Focused Review.

Ahmed Mohamed, Abed Ullah Khan, Usman Fuad, Alaa Elasad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed MohamedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Abed Ullah KhanSpinal Surgery and Neurosciences, Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, GBR.
Usman FuadTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Alaa ElasadGeneral Practice, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopedic surgeons frequently manage patients taking clopidogrel who require low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for venous thromboprophylaxis. This review examines the differences between arterial and venous thrombosis and explains why both medications are often necessary despite the increased bleeding risk. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to August 2025, screening 1,184 records and ultimately including 57 studies comprising eight randomized controlled trials, 32 cohort studies, and 17 systematic reviews. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study populations, interventions, and outcome definitions, we conducted structured narrative synthesis rather than meta-analysis. We provide clear guidance on when to stop or continue clopidogrel therapy in elective versus trauma surgery and how to safely combine it with LMWH when needed. Key recommendations include that clopidogrel alone does not prevent venous thromboembolism, LMWH remains necessary in immobilized patients, elective surgery usually requires the temporary cessation of clopidogrel, and trauma surgery should not be delayed despite ongoing therapy.

Indexed as

antiplatelet therapyarterial thrombosisbleeding riskclopidogrelhip fracturelow-molecular-weight heparinorthopedic surgeryperioperative anticoagulationvenous thromboembolism prophylaxisvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID41230281
PMCPMC12603611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.