Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230246›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2025

Clinical Assessment of Fine-Tuned Open-Source LLMs in Cardiology: From Progress Notes to Discharge Summary.

HyoJe Jung, Yunha Kim, Jiahn Seo, Heejung Choi, Minkyoung Kim, Jiye Han, Gaeun Kee, Soyoung Ko, Byeolhee Kim, Boeun Choi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

HyoJe JungDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Yunha KimDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Jiahn SeoDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Heejung ChoiDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Minkyoung KimDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Jiye HanDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Gaeun KeeDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Soyoung KoDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Byeolhee KimDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Boeun ChoiDepartment of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.
Ah-Ram KimDivision of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Min AhnDivision of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Joon Jun *Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Hak Kim *Division of Cardiology, Department of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of accurate discharge summaries from clinical progress notes represents a critical challenge in healthcare documentation, particularly in specialized domains like cardiology where limited annotated data and complex medical terminology pose significant barriers to automation. To address this challenge and improve clinical workflow efficiency, we developed a comprehensive approach combining synthetic data generation with fine-tuned large language models (LLMs), specifically leveraging Llama3.1-8B for automated discharge summary creation. Our methodology involved constructing a hybrid dataset by combining 4658 real-world cardiology discharge summaries with 12,661 high-quality synthetic records generated via the OpenAI API and validated through a T5-based binary classifier that filtered out low-quality outputs. The fine-tuned Llama3.1-8B model demonstrated superior performance across multiple evaluation metrics including ROUGE, BLEU, and BERTScore, while qualitative assessment by three expert cardiologists confirmed the model's ability to generate clinically coherent, complete, and medically relevant discharge summaries with high accuracy in capturing patient conditions and treatment details. This research makes significant contributions to the healthcare informatics community by demonstrating the feasibility of using fine-tuned open-source LLMs for specialized clinical documentation tasks, establishing a validated framework for synthetic medical data augmentation in low-resource scenarios, and providing evidence that AI-assisted clinical documentation can achieve both technical excellence and clinical utility, thereby offering a scalable solution to reduce administrative burden on healthcare professionals while maintaining high standards of patient care documentation.

Indexed as

Discharge summaryLarge language modelMedical documentationSynthetic medical records

Identifiers

PMID41230246
PMCPMC12602784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.