ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2025
Clinical Assessment of Fine-Tuned Open-Source LLMs in Cardiology: From Progress Notes to Discharge Summary.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Critical Care-Specific vs General-Purpose Large Language Models in Emergency Intensive Care Unit Diagnosis: Single-Center Retrospective Paired Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluation Frameworks for Clinical Foundation Models in Specific Tasks of Unstructured Medical Text Analysis: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Wound Images and Clinical Text for Pressure Injury Assessment and Treatment Recommendation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Classification of Cleft and Craniofacial Procedures From Operative Notes: Model Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Article
- Reimagining cardiac care with AI, LLMs, blockchain, and metaverse.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The generation of accurate discharge summaries from clinical progress notes represents a critical challenge in healthcare documentation, particularly in specialized domains like cardiology where limited annotated data and complex medical terminology pose significant barriers to automation. To address this challenge and improve clinical workflow efficiency, we developed a comprehensive approach combining synthetic data generation with fine-tuned large language models (LLMs), specifically leveraging Llama3.1-8B for automated discharge summary creation. Our methodology involved constructing a hybrid dataset by combining 4658 real-world cardiology discharge summaries with 12,661 high-quality synthetic records generated via the OpenAI API and validated through a T5-based binary classifier that filtered out low-quality outputs. The fine-tuned Llama3.1-8B model demonstrated superior performance across multiple evaluation metrics including ROUGE, BLEU, and BERTScore, while qualitative assessment by three expert cardiologists confirmed the model's ability to generate clinically coherent, complete, and medically relevant discharge summaries with high accuracy in capturing patient conditions and treatment details. This research makes significant contributions to the healthcare informatics community by demonstrating the feasibility of using fine-tuned open-source LLMs for specialized clinical documentation tasks, establishing a validated framework for synthetic medical data augmentation in low-resource scenarios, and providing evidence that AI-assisted clinical documentation can achieve both technical excellence and clinical utility, thereby offering a scalable solution to reduce administrative burden on healthcare professionals while maintaining high standards of patient care documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.