Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Straw strip mulching boosts potato yields by enhancing soil moisture and water use efficiency.

Qian Chen, Lei Chang, Fanxiang Han, Khuram Shehzad Khan, Yuwei Chai, Shouxi Chai, Linlin Wang, Jiantao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qian ChenGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.
Lei ChangGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.
Fanxiang HanCollege of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou, China.
Khuram Shehzad KhanGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.
Yuwei ChaiGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.
Shouxi ChaiGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.
Linlin WangGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.
Jiantao MaGansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Water scarcity is a critical constraint limiting potato production in semi-arid rainfed areas. Mulching practices are recognized as effective water conservation strategies; Here, we investigated the effects of mulching practices on soil moisture and their impact on potato yield. Methods: A two-year field experiment (2018 - 2019) was conducted with five treatments, traditional bare-land planting without mulching (CK); large ridges and small furrows with only ridges mulched with black plastic film in fall (FPM); a partial-field mulching using whole cornstalks in straw mulching strips that alternate with planting strips without mulch in fall (FSM); large ridges and small furrows with only ridges mulched with black plastic film in spring (SPM); a partial-field mulching using whole cornstalks in straw mulching strips that alternate with planting strips without mulch in spring (SSM). We measured soil water storage (0-200 cm), yield, water-use efficiency (WUE), and stage-specific water consumption (WC). Results: Study results demonstrated that SSM and SPM significantly increased soil water storage (0-200 cm) by 6.7% and 8.4%, yield by 14.7% and 25.1%, and water-use efficiency (WUE) by 9.2% and 14.3%, respectively, compared to CK. Compared to spring mulching, the fall mulching outperformed in improving soil water retention and yield, increasing soil water storage by an average of 10.2% vs. 4.9%, and fresh potato yield by 17.8% vs. 11.8%. SSM and SPM reduced water consumption (WC) during the early growth stage (planting-to-budding) by 8.2-9.8%, conserving water for later use. This conserved water was then available during the critical yield-forming period, leading to increased WC during budding-to-tuber expansion by 10.3-11.3%. SSM increased WC more than FSM (12.3% vs. 10.2%), while FPM increased WC more than SPM (20.3% vs. 13.1%). Discussion: The findings indicated that both the straw strip mulching (SM) and plastic film mulching (PM) optimized the water consumption structure. Fall mulching generally outperformed spring mulching because it captured and conserved autumn and winter precipitation more effectively, resulting in higher soil water storage at planting. Both straw and plastic film mulching improve water use and potato yields, with fall application were most effective. However, for sustainable production, straw strip mulching is recommended, as it offers both high crop yields and significant environmental benefits.

Indexed as

plastic film mulchingpotatostraw strip mulchingwater consumption characteristicsyield

Identifiers

PMID41230231
PMCPMC12602226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.