Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230225›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Mycorrhizal network: a bidirectional pathway between green-leaved terrestrial orchids and pine trees.

Jianxin Chen, Xiang Ma, Fengjinglin Wu, Na Qiao, Xingliang Xu, Jianrong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianxin ChenKey Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Xiang MaSchool of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Fengjinglin WuKey Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Na QiaoKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xingliang XuKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jianrong WuKey Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing evidence demonstrates that plant roots can be connected via mycorrhizal networks. Such networks in roots play key roles in plant physiology and ecosystem functioning, but it remains debated whether bidirectional transfers of resources can occur simultaneously inside the network. Methods: We constructed a compartmented system to test for bidirectional carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) transfer between three terrestrial orchids ( Results: A unidirectional transfer of C and N was observed between Discussion: The divergent transfer patterns among orchid species demonstrate that mycorrhizal networks function as dynamic, species-specific pathways for resource transfer. This specificity may significantly influence orchid recruitment and nutrient dynamics in forest understories, suggesting that the role of common mycorrhizal networks is more complex than previously recognized.

Indexed as

13C and 15N dual labellingbidirectional pathwaymycorrhizal networkorchid mycorrhizapine seedlings

Identifiers

PMID41230225
PMCPMC12602444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.