ReviewCancer management and research2025
C-Reactive Protein in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Colitis: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of probiotic supplementation on chemotherapy and radiotherapy-associated diarrhea and quality of life.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer care but frequently cause immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC), a clinically significant immune-related adverse event. Prompt diagnosis and severity assessment are essential but often rely on invasive endoscopic procedures. C-reactive protein (CRP), a widely available biomarker of systemic inflammation, has been suggested as a potential adjunct in evaluating IMDC. However, its diagnostic utility and clinical relevance remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guideline to map existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps regarding the association between CRP and IMDC. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2010-April 2025). Eligible studies included adult patients receiving ICIs who developed gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events, with reported CRP levels. Data were extracted on study design, patient population, CRP measurement, and its relationship with IMDC diagnosis, severity, or outcomes. Results: Of 538 records screened, five observational studies comprising 583 patients were included. Only one study specifically analyzed CRP levels in histologically confirmed IMDC, demonstrating a positive correlation with clinical and endoscopic severity but no validated diagnostic thresholds. The remaining studies assessed CRP as a general marker for immune-related adverse events without gastrointestinal-specific analyses or diagnostic accuracy metrics. No study provided sufficient data to establish sensitivity, specificity, or predictive values for CRP in IMDC. Conclusion: This scoping review highlights the limited and heterogeneous evidence linking CRP to IMDC and underscores the absence of validated thresholds or diagnostic performance data. For generalist physicians, CRP may serve as a supportive marker to prompt further evaluation but cannot replace established diagnostic pathways. Future prospective studies should integrate CRP with organ-specific biomarkers and standardized endpoints to clarify its role in triage and severity assessment of IMDC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.