ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025
Contemporary management of radiation-associated posterior urethral stenosis: a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Radiation-associated posterior urethral stenosis is a challenging entity to treat due to the complex anatomic location and post-radiation tissue compromise. This narrative review examines available data regarding treatment options for posterior urethral stenosis in the radiated patient population. We highlight recent advancements in surgical technique and offer the authors' opinion on an effective management approach. Methods: We reviewed English language articles from 2000 to 2025 in the PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. Key Content and Findings: It is crucial to assess functional bladder health prior to reconstruction as patients with a history of radiotherapy may demonstrate poor capacity, poor compliance, and/or refractory cystitis. Endoscopic management options are typically pursued first but are associated with high rates of reoperation in this population. A new endoscopic technique involving mucosal incision and reapproximation offers theoretical improvements over traditional incision and dilation. Abdominal and perineal approaches may be effective in refractory cases and recent data describing the use of buccal mucosal grafts in this radiated population is promising. Robot-assisted reconstruction for radiation-associated posterior urethral stenosis is associated with high rates of perineal counter-incision and subsequent reoperation. Conclusions: Management of radiation-associated posterior urethral stenosis remains challenging and is associated with significant rates of revision and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.