Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230159›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025

Management of prostatic necrosis and the devastated bladder outlet-a narrative review.

Henriette Veiby Holm, Ole Jacob Nilsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henriette Veiby HolmDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2714-6037
Ole Jacob NilsenDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-3698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Although devastating complications of the bladder outlet resulting from prostate cancer (PC) treatments are relatively uncommon, they do exist. These complications deteriorate patients' quality of life (QoL), and with the combination of increased incidence of PC and patient longevity after treatment, awareness of adverse outcomes in recent years have increased. This review discusses the incidence, risk factors, diagnostic work-up, and management options for devastated bladder outlet (DBO), resulting from PC treatment complications, requiring urinary diversion (UD). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted via OvidSP covering 1946 to present. The selection was limited to English language studies. Key Content and Findings: DBO can be a consequence of the treatment of benign conditions, but more frequently from complications of pelvic cancer treatments and especially multimodal PC treatments. Patients with a combination of complications, typically recalcitrant bladder outlet obstruction, urinary incontinence, urinary fistula, and/or severe bladder dysfunction end up in a situation we can call DBO. Initially patients will be offered conservative treatment or reconstruction. However, in the worst circumstances, such as prior radiotherapy, failed reconstruction, DBO with end-stage bladders, or patient's severe comorbidities, reconstruction may neither be realistic nor justified. UD with or without cystectomy may be the best option for these patients. Outcomes and repercussions on QoL vary extensively with management options. Meticulous preoperative diagnostic evaluation and thorough patient counseling are paramount in selecting the right treatment strategy for each individual patient. There are a wide range of UD options including a suprapubic catheter to more sophisticated solutions like augmentation cystoplasty with continent catheterizable channel and many others. Conclusions: There is a non-negligible risk of DBO after treatment of PC, especially following multimodal treatment. In the worst circumstances, management with UD may be necessary. Possible UD options are discussed.

Indexed as

Devastated bladder outlet (DBO)prostate cancer (PC)radiotherapyurinary diversion (UD)urinary reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41230159
PMCPMC12603825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.