ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Association between social determinants of health and erectile dysfunction: insights from a nationally representative US sample.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Erectile Dysfunction Among Filipino Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Hospital in San Juan City, Metro Manila, Philippines.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2026Article
- From symptomatic relief to restorative medicine: a comprehensive review of diabetic erectile dysfunction.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Beyond traditional risk factors, public health has increasingly focused on the impact of social determinants of health (SDoHs) on disease risk. However, no studies have systematically evaluated the effects of both individual and cumulative SDoHs on the risk of erectile dysfunction (ED), representing a critical gap that our study aims to address. Methods: Data were collected from a representative sample of adult men participating in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2001 to 2004. Self-reported SDoHs were categorized based on Healthy People 2030 criteria, with a cumulative score of favorable SDoHs created for analysis. ED was assessed using a validated single-item measure. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the effects of individual and cumulative SDoHs on ED risk. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to enhance the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 3,489 eligible participants were included, with 1,001 diagnosed with ED. Unfavorable SDoHs showed significant associations with increased ED risk: being unemployed [odds ratio (OR): 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40, 2.77], family income-to-poverty ratio <300% (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.06, P<0.001), marginal-to-very-low food security (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.20, P=0.04), high school education or lower (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.81, P=0.01), and non-homeownership (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.53, P=0.04). A strong inverse relationship was observed between the cumulative count of favorable SDoHs and ED risk (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.93, P=0.002). When treated as categorical variables, lower-middle [3-4] and low levels [0-2] of SDoHs were associated with higher ED risk (ORs: 1.76 and 2.62, P<0.05). Additionally, sensitivity analysis showed that the low-level group (0-2 SDoHs) had a significantly higher risk of severe ED compared to the high-level group (OR =3.78, 95% CI: 1.26, 11.34, P=0.02). Conclusions: The findings suggest that unfavorable SDoHs, particularly when accumulated, are associated with increased risk of ED among U.S. men. Addressing unfavorable SDoHs should be a public health priority, not only to improve male sexual health, but also to promote health equity and overall population well-being. Large-scale population cohort studies are underway to provide higher-level evidence supporting our conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.