ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of clear cell papillary renal cell tumor: a retrospective population-based analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clear cell papillary renal cell tumor (ccpRCT) is a novel tumor entity which shares morphologic features with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC). The aim of this study was to comprehensively explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of ccpRCT in the real-world setting with the largest cohort to date. Methods: A total of 59,076 eligible RCC patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2021 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included in this retrospective analysis. The demographic and clinicopathological variables of ccpRCT patients were compared to those of ccRCC or pRCC patients. The survival curves were generated via the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: Compared with ccRCC and pRCC patients, those with ccpRCT were more frequently diagnosed with lower grade (G1/2) and lower stage (I/II), and exhibited prolonged OS and DSS. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age at diagnosis; histological grade; tumor (T), node (N), metastasis (M) and overall stage; treatment type; and history of cancer were significantly associated with both OS and DSS. In addition, age at diagnosis and treatment type were crucial prognostic factors in terms of both OS and DSS according to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the highly favorable outcomes in ccpRCT patients with low potential of lymph node invasion, metastasis, or disease specific death, and surgery is associated with improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.