ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Large stone in neobladder: percutaneous neocystolithotomy.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents the percutaneous management of a large 8 cm neobladder calculus in a 27-year-old male with a history of bladder exstrophy, augmentation cystoplasty, and Mitrofanoff conduit. Urolithiasis presents a heavy burden in patients with urinary diversion, with reported rates of up to 52% and recurrence rates approaching 63% following intervention. In addition to recurrent infections and pain, the unique environment of a neobladder encourages significant calculi growth, necessitating repeat complex surgery. In this patient, his prior open surgery, complex anatomy and reliance on the Mitrofanoff as the sole drainage route deemed open surgery unsafe. Therefore, a minimally invasive neocystolithotomy was performed. Using computed tomography (CT)-guided tract preoperative planning, a tailored extraperitoneal approach was undertaken and a dual-energy lithotripter was employed for approximately 150 minutes. Complete stone clearance of 218 g struvite calculus was achieved without intraoperative or postoperative complications. This case illustrates the safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive approach in patients with complex lower urinary tract reconstructions. Such methods optimise patient outcomes while minimising the risks of injury, perforation and infection associated with the traditional open approach. The report outlines key technical considerations and emphasises the importance of multidisciplinary coordination when managing complex urolithiasis in reconstructed urinary systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.