SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Oral commercial Chinese polyherbal preparations combined with conventional biomedicine for pulmonary tuberculosis: network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite therapeutic interventions, tuberculosis (TB) remains a persistent challenge. Combination therapy integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with conventional anti-TB medications demonstrates therapeutic benefits, necessitating a meta-analysis evaluating the adjunctive use of oral commercial Chinese polyherbal preparation (CCPP). Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different oral TCMs combined with biomedicine for tuberculosis treatment, utilizing network meta-analysis techniques. Methods: A computer-based search was conducted across various databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, SinoMed, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering records from database inception to 22 January 2025. Data analysis utilized Stata 18.0, R software (version 4.4.1), and Review Manager 5.4. Results: A total of 100 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with a total sample size of 12,747 participants (6,639 in the experimental group and 6,108 in the control group), evaluating 12 distinct interventions. Network meta-analysis revealed the following optimal combinations: FeiJieHe Pill combined with standard biomedicine demonstrated superior efficacy for clinical response rate improvement (OR = 8.43, 95% CI [1.79, 39.69]). KangLao Pill combined with standard biomedicine was the most effective for negative conversion rate (OR = 11.55, 95% CI [3.04, 43.93]). Bu Jin Tablet combined with standard biomedicine demonstrated superior efficacy for lesion absorption rate (OR = 7.46, 95% CI [3.32, 16.75]). FeiJieHe Pill combined with standard biomedicine was the most effective for cavity absorption (OR = 5.11, 95% CI [2.04, 12.85]). JieHe Pill combined with conventional biomedicine yielded the greatest improvement in both CD3 Conclusion: Combination therapy utilizing oral CCPP alongside conventional biomedicine has a significant enhanced efficacy relative to conventional biomedicine monotherapy across multiple tuberculosis treatment metrics, including clinical efficacy rate, negative conversion rate, lesion absorption rate, cavity absorption rate, and improvement rates of CD3 Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024589122, identifier CRD42024589122.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.