Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Care, career and health in times of digitalization-insights into the experiences of caring scientists.

Hanna Haag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hanna HaagDepartment of Social Work and Health, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines the experiences of caregiving scientists about the impact on well-being due to the increasing digitalization at work. The data is based on two qualitative research project using group discussions with scientists in positions of responsibility at German universities, which were evaluated using the documentary method and grounded theory. Contrary to the assumption that digitalization has a positive effect on health and well-being of those working in academia, the results show an increasing performance expectations in terms of permanent availability, which has a negative impact on the physical and mental health of those surveyed and exacerbates self-exploitation where physical boundaries are disregarded. The article contributes to the discourse on health and well-being in academia as well as on digitalization at the workplace with a special focus on care work.

Indexed as

careCOVID-19digitalizationhealthhome officescience

Identifiers

PMID41230048
PMCPMC12602525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.