Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230019›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Prevention of recurrent

Sahil Khanna, David Yoho, Daniel Van Handel, Brian J Clark, Tahany Awad, Beth Guthmueller, Daniel Armandi, Whitfield Knapple, Nasia Safdar, Brian Baggott and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05831189 (A Multi-center, Single-arm Trial Exploring the Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of RBX2660 Administered by Colonoscopy to Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05831189 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Single-arm Trial Exploring the Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of RBX2660 Administered by Colonoscopy to Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorFerring PharmaceuticalsRan2023 to 2025Enrolled41ConditionsClostridium Difficile Infection RecurrenceArmsRBX2660
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sahil KhannaMayo Clinic, Rochester, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
David YohoMid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Springfield, VA, USA.
Daniel Van HandelMNGI Digestive Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brian J ClarkFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tahany AwadFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Beth GuthmuellerFerring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Daniel ArmandiFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Whitfield KnappleArkansas Gastroenterology, North Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4081-3304
Nasia SafdarUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Brian BaggottCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Karen SimonOm Research, Camarillo, CA, USA.
Paul FeuerstadtPACT Gastroenterology Center, Yale School of Medicine, Hamden, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-9576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is a microbiota-based product for the prevention of recurrent Objectives: To evaluate long-term safety and clinical effectiveness of RBL through 6 months of follow-up in CDI-SCOPE. Design: Single-arm exploratory phase IIIb trial conducted at 12 sites in the United States. Methods: Eligible adults with rCDI received a single 150-mL dose of RBL to the right colon via colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was RBL-related TEAEs through 8 weeks after RBL administration or confirmed treatment failure. Secondary endpoints included safety up to 6 months after RBL administration. Exploratory analyses included assessment of further CDI episodes. Results: Of the 41 participants enrolled, 39 completed trial assessments through 6 months. From 8 weeks through 6 months after RBL administration, 36 TEAEs in 15 participants (36.6%) were reported, one of which (irritable bowel syndrome) was RBL-related; most TEAEs (97.2%) were of mild or moderate severity. Over the 6-month trial period, 23 participants (56.1%) experienced 69 TEAEs; 94.2% were of mild or moderate severity. Serious TEAEs occurred in three participants (7.3%), none of which were related to RBL or its administration, and no TEAEs led to discontinuation or death. Overall, 38 participants (92.7%) did not experience further CDI episodes, 1 (2.4%) did between 8 weeks and 6 months, and 2 (4.9%) had an indeterminate outcome due to trial withdrawal before 8 weeks. Conclusion: RBL administered via colonoscopy was safe and effective for preventing CDI recurrence in adults with rCDI in CDI-SCOPE. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05831189.

Indexed as

CDIClostridioides difficilecolonoscopylive biotherapeuticRBLRBX2660rCDI

Identifiers

PMID41230019
PMCPMC12602906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.