ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
EEG power modulation in the sensorimotor regions is critical to motor tic suppression.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The neural mechanisms underlying tic suppression in chronic tic disorder (CTD) have been investigated using various neuroimaging modalities. A limitation in studying CTD is that abrupt motor action is inherent to the nature of the disorder, but the movement makes any form of neural recording challenging. However, recent advances in hardware and software technologies have enabled EEG studies during motion, which open new avenues for studying CTD with EEG. Methods: We performed an event-related EEG power spectral analysis in children with chronic tic disorder (CTD) or typically developing children (TDC) as controls in a sample of 76 children (39 CTD) contributing to the final statistics. There were three block-separated conditions: no suppression (NoSupp), suppression with verbal instruction (Supp Results: During tic or blink suppression, both CTD and TDC showed EEG power increase centered within the theta range in frontal, cingulate, and central regions. Meanwhile, the CTD group showed the opposite pattern in broadband EEG power modulation relative to controls, particularly in the centro-temporal sensorimotor regions. The regression analysis between this broadband power and tic suppression performance resulted in a significant positive correlation. Conclusions: Better tic suppression was associated with increased EEG power, a similar pattern observed among controls during blink suppression. EEG power in sensorimotor regions is a neural marker of tic suppression performance in children with CTD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.