Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229947›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025

What Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicator Processes of Care Were Patients Receiving across Canada in 2018? A National Patient Registry and Pooled Analysis.

Amanda Carroccia, Olavo A Fernandes, Kent Toombs, Sean K Gorman, Sean P Spina, William M Semchuk, Andrea Meade, Donna Lowe, Tania Bayoud, Stephen Shalansky and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Indicators of Quality Care-What We Do Matters.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  2. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Amanda CarrocciaPharmD, is with the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.
Olavo A FernandesPharmD, is with the University Health Network and the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Kent ToombsMHS, is with Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Sean K GormanPharmD, is with the Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Sean P SpinaPharmD, is with Island Health, Victoria, British Columbia, and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
William M SemchukPharmD, is with the Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, and the College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Andrea MeadeBScPhm, is with Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Donna LowePharmD, is with the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.
Tania BayoudPharmD, is with St Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario.
Stephen ShalanskyPharmD, is with Providence Health Care and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Nadia M FaccaMHS, was, at the time of this study, with the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario. She is now with Alexandra Hospital Ingersoll, Ingersoll, Ontario, and the Tillsonburg District Memorial Hospital, Tillsonburg, Ontario.
Winnie SetoPharmD, is with The Hospital for Sick Children and the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Jean-François BussièresMSc, is with CHU Sainte-Justine and the Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec.
Gary G WongBScPhm, is with the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.
Philip LuiPharmD, is with the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.
Richard S SlavikPharmD, is with the Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Douglas DoucettePharmD, is with Horizon Health Network, Moncton, New Brunswick, and the College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Gali LatariyaPharmD, is with Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Clarence ChantPharmD, is with Unity Health Toronto and the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: National consensus-based clinical pharmacy key performance indicators (cpKPIs) are health quality indicators representing processes of care associated with an impact on meaningful patient outcomes. Canadian hospitals are measuring cpKPIs at the local level. However, variations exist regarding which cpKPIs are measured and the associated cpKPI practice profiles. At the time this study was undertaken, a national registry did not exist to capture real-world cpKPI patient data and to track pooled national progress. Objectives: To develop a national cpKPI patient registry, to characterize cpKPI-related care delivered, and to generate pooled national summary cpKPI reports to inform the advancement of pharmacy practice and improve patient outcomes. Methods: In this national, retrospective, observational quality improvement study, hospitals measuring at least one cpKPI in at least one inpatient area were enrolled and submitted aggregated, de-identified cpKPI patient data for the calendar year 2018 (January to December). Patient-proportion cpKPI data for individual hospitals were summarized, and pooled national reports were generated. Results: Overall, 32 Canadian health care organizations were enrolled, capturing 275 896 patient visits. The core analysis focused on 25 acute care institutions that were continuously measuring cpKPIs. The most commonly delivered cpKPI processes of care were development of a pharmaceutical care plan (59% of patients), resolution of drug therapy problems (37% of patients), and participation in interprofessional patient care rounds (36% of patients). The least commonly delivered cpKPI care services were patient medication education during the hospital stay (7% of patients), medication reconciliation at discharge (15% of patients), and patient medication education at discharge (17% of patients). Conclusions: The first national registry for capturing clinical pharmacy health quality indicators was established and used to characterize real-world cpKPI-related patient care delivery. The findings from this registry could facilitate hospital-level cpKPI benchmarking and could support national sharing of best practices to advance pharmacy practice and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacyhealth quality indicatorskey performance indicatorsmedication reconciliationpatient registrypharmaceutical care

Identifiers

PMID41229947
PMCPMC12604904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.