ReviewDigital health
Industry 5.0 adaptation for disability-inclusive healthcare: A review of emergent and AI technologies for assistive digital health.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industry 5.0 is reshaping healthcare through human-centric design, sustainability, and advanced technologies. However, there is limited insight into how these innovations address the specific needs of people with disabilities. This review aims to examine the role of emerging and AI-driven technologies in enabling disability-inclusive digital healthcare solutions. A comprehensive scoping review was conducted, focusing on studies published in recent years on Industry 5.0 technologies applied to disability-inclusive digital healthcare pathways. Key technologies reviewed include collaborative robotics, virtual reality, telemedicine, and human-centered artificial intelligence. Relevant case studies and ethical considerations were also analysed. The analysis highlighted that Industry 5.0 technologies show promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, personalization, and accessibility for people with disabilities. Applications include remote assessments, assistive tools, and adaptive interfaces that improve diagnostic processes. Despite this progress, integration of these technologies remains fragmented, and challenges such as ethical concerns, regulatory barriers, and inclusive design persist. This review uniquely synthesizes these technologies within the framework of Industry 5.0, offering a broader perspective than prior single-technology reviews and proposing a roadmap for the successful implementation that incorporates training, regulatory alignment, interdisciplinary collaboration, social-economic barriers, real-world evidence, and inclusivity across disability types. As conclusion, Industry 5.0 holds significant promise for advancing disability-inclusive digital healthcare. Realizing this potential, however, requires coordinated efforts to address integration gaps, strengthen ethical and regulatory frameworks, and embed user-centered co-design principles. Future research should focus on more developing inclusive, and sustainable diagnostic solutions aligned with Industry 5.0 principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.