ArticleDigital health
Machine learning-based fatigue classification using heart rate variability and cortisol: A multimodal approach to wearable health monitoring.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human-inspired time-series health evaluation with an adaptive multimodal electronic skin.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Fatigue is a critical indicator in modern health management, and efficient, accurate methods for predicting fatigue levels using wearable devices have garnered increasing attention. Although recent advancements have enabled non-invasive cortisol measurement via wearable sensors, it remains unclear how effectively cortisol, in combination with other physiological biomarkers, predicts fatigue. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal machine learning model that integrates cortisol levels and heart rate variability (HRV) for fatigue prediction. Methods: Data from 336 participants who completed the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) were analyzed. Missing data mechanisms for cortisol were examined, and multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICEs) were applied. A TabNet deep-learning model was used to predict low and high fatigue levels based on HRV and cortisol data. Results: The model using only HRV variables achieved a test AUC of 0.774, whereas the model incorporating both HRV and cortisol levels achieved 0.741, indicating a minimal overall performance difference. Feature importance analysis revealed that, in the cortisol-included model, predictions relied on a limited set of features. When feature selection was applied to this model, a reduced set of variables-age, cortisol, and logarithmic very low frequency-achieved comparable predictive performance (AUC = 0.759) without performance degradation. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a fatigue prediction model based on cortisol and HRV can maintain significant predictive power with a reduced number of variables. These findings suggest the potential for practical implementation in wearable devices, enabling accurate fatigue monitoring while minimizing sensor count and computational burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.