ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Continuing immune checkpoint inhibitors after pseudoprogression improves survival in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing the clinical assessment of pseudoprogression in patients with solid tumors treated with checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of associated features.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Pooled it
- Is Pseudo-progression post-CAR T therapy real?Clinical hematology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pseudoprogression (PsP) in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) complicates treatment decisions. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of continuing versus discontinuing ICI post-PsP and developed tools for PsP identification via an individual patient data (IPD) pooled analysis. Methods: This IPD pooled analysis included 40 PsP cases (4 institutional cases + 36 literature-derived cases, who were categorized into continued-ICI and interrupted-ICI groups. Prognoses were compared using Fisher's exact test (12-month survival) and Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests (median overall survival). A chest computed tomography (CT) pattern diagram and proposed diagnostic-therapeutic framework were developed. Results: The median time to PsP onset was 8 weeks. Initially, 87.5% of cases were misclassified as progressive disease (PD) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), whereas Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) corrected such misclassifications. Continued ICI treatment was associated with significantly longer median overall survival (16.6 Conclusions: Continuing ICIs post-PsP improves outcomes in lung cancer patients. iRECIST facilitates the accurate diagnosis of PsP, while chest CT pattern diagrams and a diagnostic-therapeutic framework contribute to optimizing the management of immunotherapy. Prospective trials are warranted to validate this framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.