ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Ultrasound superiority in detecting micro rib lesions for post-coronavirus disease 2019 chest wall pain: a comparative retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients often experience persistent chest wall pain, highlighting the need for effective diagnostic imaging. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) in detecting chest wall lesions in patients with post-COVID-19 chest pain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients experiencing sudden chest wall pain with a fixed position following COVID-19 at a tertiary hospital from December 1 to December 31, 2022. Patients underwent US and/or CT examinations and were classified into positive and negative groups based on the US and CT results. We compared data on chest pain duration, cough severity [assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)], chest pain severity (assessed by VAS), and pain relief between the two groups. Results: A total of 47 patients participated in the study: 25 in the positive group and 22 in the negative group. No significant differences were found in the duration of COVID-19 or chest pain (P=0.58 and P=0.71). However, the VAS scores for pain and cough severity were significantly higher in the positive group (P<0.01). At the follow-up visit, 3-4 weeks later, the positive group also showed greater pain relief (P<0.01). All 25 patients in the positive group had positive ultrasonography results, with rib changes in 17, primarily non-displaced fractures in 12. Only 5 patients (20%) in this group had positive CT results, all indicating rib lesions. Conclusions: Chest wall pain in post-COVID-19 patients with a cough may stem from various factors, primarily rib lesions. US is more effective than CT scans for detecting these lesions and provides a safe, portable, high-resolution monitoring method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.