ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Safety and early outcomes of nighttime lung transplantation with a surgical multidisciplinary team in a low-volume center.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung transplantation (LTx) in high-volume centers is associated with favorable outcomes. Nighttime LTx is often unavoidable due to unpredictable donor availability and the need to minimize graft ischemic time. However, even in high-volume centers, nighttime procedures have been linked to increased postoperative complications. A surgical multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach may improve early outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of nighttime LTx in a low-volume center employing a surgical MDT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bilateral LTx between December 2016 and September 2023. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the timing of the skin incision: daytime (8:00 AM-8:00 PM) and nighttime (8:00 PM-8:00 AM). We compared surgical metrics and short-term outcomes-including primary graft dysfunction, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, total hospital stay, and 1-year survival-between the two groups. Results: A total of 70 patients underwent bilateral LTx during the study period. In our center, which adopts a surgical MDT approach, the 30-day and 1-year survival rates were 99% and 91%, respectively. Among patients who underwent nighttime LTx, the total anastomosis time was significantly longer compared to the daytime group (119 Conclusions: In a low-volume center, the surgical MDT approach was associated with favorable short-term outcomes, even during nighttime LTx. These findings support the role of MDT in enabling safe and effective transplantation regardless of operative timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.