ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
More than just a heatmap: elevating XAI with rigorous evaluation metrics.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and ultrasound are central to tumour diagnosis and treatment planning. Although Deep learning (DL) models achieve strong prediction performance, high computational demand and limited explainability can hinder clinical adoption. Common post hoc Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods namely Grad-CAM, LIME, and SHAP often yield fragmented or anatomically misaligned saliency maps. Methods: We propose SpikeNet, a hybrid framework that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial feature encoding with Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs)for efficient, event driven processing. SpikeNet includes a native saliency module that produces explanations during inference. We also introduce XAlign, a metric that quantifies alignment between explanations and expert tumour annotations by integrating regional concentration, boundary adherence, and dispersion penalties. Evaluation follows patient level cross validation on TCGA-LGG (MRI, 22 folds) and BUSI (ultrasound, 5 folds), with slice level predictions aggregated to patient level decisions and BUSI treated as a three class task. We report per image latency and throughput alongside accuracy, precision, recall, F1, AUROC, and AUPRC. Results: SpikeNet achieved high prediction performance with tight variability across folds. On TCGA-LGG it reached Conclusion: SpikeNet delivers accurate, low latency, and explainable analysis for MRI and ultrasound by unifying CNN based spatial encoding, sparse spiking computation, and native explanations. The XAlign metric provides a clinically oriented assessment of explanation fidelity and supports consistent comparison across methods. These results indicate the potential of SpikeNet and XAlign for trustworthy and efficient clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.