Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229567›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025

Adapting the World Health Organization 5 Well-Being Index for Emergency Activation and Response Planning in a US Health Care Setting.

Laura E Breeher, Elizabeth H Lees, Wigdan H Farah, Richard D Newcomb, Caitlin M Hainy, Byron I Callies, Philip T Schroeder, Melanie D Swift

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura E BreeherDivision of Public Health, Infectious Disease, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Elizabeth H LeesDivision of Public Health, Infectious Disease, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Wigdan H FarahDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Richard D NewcombDivision of Public Health, Infectious Disease, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Caitlin M HainyOccupational Health Services, Practice Administration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Byron I CalliesGlobal Security, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Philip T SchroederClinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Melanie D SwiftDivision of Public Health, Infectious Disease, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To test the World Health Organization 5 Well-Being Index assessment tool as a practical way of detecting well-being changes across health care providers (HCPs) during high-consequence infectious disease (HCID) outbreaks. Participants and Methods: The study took place from October 2014 to March 2015 at a Midwest referral hospital with 2059 beds on 2 campuses. The study focused on a group of HCPs recruited for Ebola emergency response planning during the HCID outbreak in Africa. Results: Average well-being scores were worse during the initial weeks and months of the Ebola emergency response planning. Scores were lower (worse) among employees actively involved in response planning. Conclusion: Health care personnel (HCP) responding to HCID outbreaks face significant physical, cognitive, and emotional stressors Despite this, well-being assessments are not consistently integrated into emergency response plans. The World Health Organization 5 Well-Being Index assessment tool offers a practical way to detect well-being changes across HCP during HCID outbreak and response.

Identifiers

PMID41229567
PMCPMC12603734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.