Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229544›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Advanced biosensor technology for mycotoxin detection.

Xinya Tong, Ning Chen, Mengzhi Wang, Xiaodong Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MoSMikrochimica acta · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinya TongCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Ning ChenInstitute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, China.
Mengzhi WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Xiaodong GuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing incidence of food safety related to mycotoxin contamination highlights a significant global challenge. Traditional mycotoxin detection methods, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chromatographic techniques (e.g., high-performance liquid chromatography, HPLC), are often limited by prolonged analysis time, inadequate sensitivity, high costs, and operational complexity, which impede their practical application. In contrast, biosensor technology, possesses interdisciplinary advancements, has emerged as a key area of research due to its inherent advantages, including high sensitivity, rapid response, and cost-effectiveness. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent technological advancements in the development of highly sensitive biosensors for mycotoxin detection. Furthermore, we propose that future developments should strategically incorporate artificial intelligence (AI), sustainable nanomaterials, and other innovative approaches to enhance biosensor performance significantly and expand their practical applicability in ensuring food safety.

Indexed as

aptamerbiosensorsfood safetymycotoxinsnanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID41229544
PMCPMC12603913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.