ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Effect of Anatomic Joint-Line Obliquity Prostheses on Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Alignment in a Chinese Population.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification describes knee phenotypes based on limb alignment and joint-line obliquity (JLO). This study evaluates CPAK distribution in the Hong Kong population and assesses how prosthesis design affects CPAK reproducibility and clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with adjusted mechanical alignment in a single institution in 2021. First, we analyzed the epidemiology of CPAK phenotypes in our population. Second, patients were divided into 2 propensity score-matched groups based on implant design: Journey II BCS TKA (JLO prothesis) vs Persona PS TKA (joint line neutral prothesis). Radiological outcomes (mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle) and clinical outcomes (range of motion, Knee Society Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, Forgotten Joint Score) assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Our CPAK distribution was comparable to that of other East Asian populations. The Journey II BCS TKA more effectively restored JLO and CPAK phenotypes compared to the Persona PS TKA. However, there was no statistically significant clinical correlation between the restoration of JLO, arithmetic HKA, and CPAK. Conclusions: Although radiological restoration improves with JLO prostheses, short-term clinical outcomes remain unaffected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.