ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients Aged Over 75 Years.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Tumors in Older Patients: Balancing Oncologic Benefit and Geriatric Risk.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients Aged Over 75 Years.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy, and prognostic factors of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Methods: We retrospectively collected cases of colorectal ESD performed between January 2008 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: elderly (≥ 75 years) and nonelderly (< 75 years). We compared clinicopathological characteristics, clinical outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) between the groups. We also analyzed factors associated with OS in the elderly group. Results: A total of 523 patients with 548 lesions were enrolled. Among them, 168 patients with 175 lesions were classified as elderly, and 355 patients with 373 lesions were in the nonelderly group. No significant differences were found in en bloc resection, curative resection, or complication rates between the two groups ( Conclusions: Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective treatment for patients aged ≥ 75 years. Indication for colorectal ESD should be carefully determined based on comorbidities and nutritional status to improve outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.