ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
High comprehensive complication index after minimally invasive esophagectomy associated with poor short-term and long-term outcome: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a valuable index to comprehensively and systematically evaluate complication severity. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of comprehensive complication index on short- and long-term overall survival(OS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing Mckeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Methods: A total of 320 patients treated with radical MIE from 2013 to 2017 were included, and the primary outcome was OS. Firstly, the optimal cut-off value of CCI was determined by X-tile. Propensity score matching(PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Second, postoperative hospital stay and hospital costs between high- and low-CCI groups were compared. Third, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival differences. Fourth, Cox analysis was used to explore the risk factors of OS. Fifth, univariate and multivariate logistic analysis was used to determine the risk factors of high CCI. Results: The patients with CCI > 24.2 was defined as high-CCI group, and those with CCI ≤ 24.2 were assigned to low-CCI group. The high-CCI group had more hospital costs and longer hospital stays than the low-CCI group before and after PSM (both p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicated that high-CCI group had worse prognosis both before and after PSM (before matching: P<0.001; after matching: P = 0.01). CCI was determined as an independent prognostic factor (before PSM, P = 0.001; after PSM, P = 0.003). Conclusion: The CCI could quantify postoperative complications after esophagectomy. High CCI was associated with longer postoperative hospital stays and expenses and is an independent risk factor for poor OS, holding great vlaue for reference for medical insurance, surgical quality and prognosis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.