ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Differentiation between G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma based on intratumor and peritumor CT value ratio and abnormal vascular network.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop a model based on computed tomography (CT) images to differentiate between grade 3 (G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNECs). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed pNETs and pNECs who underwent abdominal CT examinations at JINCHENG GENERAL Hospital between June 2012 and June 2023. Tumor and peri-tumor CT characteristics were assessed, including peri-tumor areas A (0-10 mm) and B (10-20 mm) during the arterial and portal venous phases of dynamic enhancement. A model was established using binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 42 patients were included: 20 with G3 pNETs and 22 with pNECs. The ROC analysis showed that the combination of the arterial phase CT ratio B1, portal venous phase CT ratio B2, pancreatic duct invasion (PDI), peripancreatic fat infiltration (PFI), and abnormal vascular network (AVN) [area under the ROC curve (AUC)=0.970 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.927-1.000), sensitivity=95.50%, and specificity=90.00%] exhibited a better performance in identifying G3 pNETs and pNECs than the combination of the arterial phase CT ratio B1 and the portal venous phase CT ratio B2 [AUC = 0.907 (95% CI: 0.818-0.996), sensitivity=77.30%, and specificity=95.00%], and the combination of arterial phase CT ratio B1, portal venous phase CT ratio B2, and AVN [AUC = 0.923 (95% CI: 0.810-1.000), sensitivity=81.80%, and specificity=85.00%]. Conclusion: The enhancement ratio between the tumor and peri-tumoral B area in the arterial and portal venous phases, along with AVN, PFI, and PDI, may serve as effective indicators for distinguishing pNECs from G3 pNETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.