ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Videos in short video sharing platforms as a source of information on bipolar disorder: a cross-sectional content analysis study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about choledocholithiasis on TikTok and Bilibili in China.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Assessment of quality, reliability, and interactive characteristics of age-related macular degeneration short videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Videos in short-video sharing platforms as sources of information on heatstroke: a cross-sectional content analysis study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessing the quality and reliability of health information on GLP-1 receptor agonists on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional analysis of the public health infodemic.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study on the quality and reliability of short videos related to precancerous cervical lesions on major platforms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and content analysis of syphilis-related short videos on Douyin (TikTok): A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bipolar disorder is a prevalent mental health issue characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and depression, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. With the rise of short video sharing platforms, there is an urgent need to evaluate the quality and reliability of the medical information disseminated regarding this disorder. Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality and reliability of videos related to bipolar disorder available on popular Chinese short video platforms, including TikTok, Kwai, Bilibili, WeChat, Xiaohongshu, and Baidu. Methods: A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted in May 2025, using keywords related to bipolar disorder to retrieve relevant videos from selected platforms. The quality of the videos was evaluated using multiple standardized assessment tools, including the JAMA Benchmarking Criteria, GQS, modified DISCERN, PEMAT, and HONCODE. Results: Significant differences in video quality and audience engagement metrics were observed across platforms. TikTok and Kwai had higher quality scores, while WeChat resulted in more comments. Most videos were created by medical professionals, although independent users also contributed content. Overall, video quality was inconsistent and not necessarily correlated with engagement metrics, highlighting the necessity for improved standards in disseminating health-related information on social media. Conclusion: On Chinese short video platforms, clinical practitioners are the main creators of bipolar disorder-related content, but their scientific nature, production quality, and information transparency still need to be improved. It is suggested to improve the platform management, creator training, and algorithm optimization, so as to promote the improvement of public mental health literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.