ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Machine learning enables early risk stratification of hymenopteran stings: evidence from a tropical multicenter cohort.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hymenopteran stings (from bees, wasps, and hornets) can trigger severe systemic reactions, especially in tropical regions, risking patient safety and emergency care efficiency. Accurate early risk stratification is essential to guide timely intervention. Objective: To develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of severe outcomes following hymenopteran stings. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 942 cases from a multicenter cohort in Hainan Province, China. Questionnaires with >20% missing data were excluded. Mean substitution was applied for primary missing data imputation, with multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) used for sensitivity analysis. Seven supervised classifiers were trained using five-fold cross-validation; class imbalance was addressed using the adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN) algorithm. Model performance was evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), recall, and precision, and feature importance was interpreted using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results: Among 942 patients, 8.7% developed severe systemic complications. The distribution by species was: wasps (25.5%), honey bees (8.9%), and unknown species (65.6%). The optimal Extra Trees model achieved an AUC of 0.982, recall of 0.956, and precision of 0.926 in the held-out validation set. Key predictors included hypotension, dyspnea, altered mental status, elevated leukocyte counts, and abnormal creatinine levels. A web-based risk calculator was deployed for bedside application. Given the small number of high-risk cases, these high AUC values may overestimate real-world performance and require external validation. Conclusion: We developed an interpretable, deployable tool for early triage of hymenopteran sting patients in tropical settings. Emergency integration may improve clinical decisions and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.