Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

SDG3 sustainable development model for Chinese ethnic intangible cultural heritage sports projects: a quantitative study.

Jiangping Fu, Hua Li, Yi Yu, Ninggang Yue, Weiping Zhang, Tian Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiangping FuNantong Institute of Technology, Nantong, China.
Hua LiSports School, Sichuan Technology and Business University, Sichuan, China.
Yi YuNantong Institute of Technology, Nantong, China.
Ninggang YueJiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China.
Weiping ZhangSports School, Nantong Normal College, Nantong, China.
Tian ZhouSichuan University, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Background: The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2022 report emphasizes that 75% of intangible cultural heritage projects worldwide face the "modernization trap", with the intensity of risk positively correlated with the degree of commercialization of the project. Sports projects should avoid this concrete phenomenon. The sustainable development of China's ethnic intangible cultural heritage sports projects must be based on a comprehensive/integrated model that encompasses sports culture (culture, economy, society, and resources). Method: Using integrated model theory, a sustainable development model was created. A group of 10 experts was established, and data was obtained through two rounds of questionnaires administered to the expert group. Through sports culture theory, combined with the EGG model (aggregation model), identify risk factors for safety accidents, identify risk factors for the lack of sports culture (intangible cultural heritage), and identify the relationship between the two types of risks. Based on a multi-subject collaboration mechanism, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) is incorporated as a multi-criteria decision-making method to calculate the prominence and correlation of influencing factors and assess the degree of impact of risk factors. Results: A fault tree analysis of 54 indicators (risk factors) was conducted to determine a model for the sustainable development of intangible cultural heritage sports projects (EGG), including 5 first-level indicators, 11 s-level indicators, and 38 third-level indicators. The most prominent and influential factors (risk factors) that have been identified include five third-level indicators and one first-level indicator. Risks level-3 indicators) are divided into 5 major prominent causes/factors (T5, T6, T17, T23, and T34), and 4 major related causes/factors (T3, T7, T20, T33, and T36). The F5 intangible cultural heritage (sports) dimension, as an important dimension of the sustainable development model (representing well-being), was observed (third prominent indicator, not last place; the lowest related causes/factors; sustainable well-being is not yet apparent). Conclusion: The results indicate that quantitative (calculation) integrated models are scientific and reliable tools, which can be used to reduce the risk assessment of sustainable development in Chinese ethnic intangible cultural heritage sports projects.

Indexed as

Chinaethnic intangible cultural heritageintegrated modequantitativerisk factorssports culturesustainable development

Identifiers

PMID41229462
PMCPMC12603912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.