ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Validity, reliability, and feasibility of the digital motor performance test (DigiMot).
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Assessing and monitoring physical fitness in children and adolescents requires valid, reliable, and feasible tests. The digital motor performance test (DigiMot) was developed for remote assessment via videoconference. This study evaluated its validity, reliability, and feasibility in children and adolescents. Methods: A total of 1,751 participants aged 5-17 years took part in this study. They completed four fitness tasks assessing coordination (Jumping Sideways), muscular endurance (Push-ups and Sit-ups), and flexibility (Stand-and-Reach). Validity was assessed by comparing remote and face-to-face performances ( Results: Concurrent validity was good for Jumping Sideways (ICC = .844), Push-ups (ICC = .718), and Sit-ups (ICC = .831), with almost perfect agreement for Stand-and-Reach ( Discussion: The DigiMot test demonstrates good to excellent validity, reliability, and feasibility, while addressing a relevant gap in remote physical fitness testing for children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.