Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229449›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025

Novel

Kamilla Sedov, Carla Manrique-Enciso, Madison James Yang, Ismael Araujo-Aliaga, Egor Dolzhenko, Samantha Kalla, Sarah Bowman Kingan, Elison Sarapura-Castro, Andrea Rivera- Valdivia, Maryenela Zaida Illanes-Manrique and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kamilla SedovDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3241-5165
Carla Manrique-EncisoNeurogenetics Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-6876
Madison James YangDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0067-9877
Ismael Araujo-AliagaNeurogenetics Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-9351
Egor DolzhenkoPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-0677
Samantha KallaPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6533-5665
Sarah Bowman KinganPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-0189
Elison Sarapura-CastroNeurogenetics Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-3062
Andrea Rivera- ValdiviaNeurogenetics Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3911-9776
Maryenela Zaida Illanes-ManriqueNeurogenetics Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima, Peru.
Mario Cornejo-OlivasNeurogenetics Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-5680
Birgitt SchüleDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-5776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (SCA10) is an autosomal-dominant disorder caused by intronic expansions of pentanucleotide repeats in the Methods: We used a novel multiplex 20-gene panel with Cas9-targeted, amplification-free long-read sequencing (LRS) and optical genome mapping to elucidate Results: We detected Discussion: Our key novel finding is the prominence of the alternate ATTCC motif alongside the common ATTCT motif. While repeat length alone does not appear to drive disease onset in SCA10, we uncovered that the ratio of the ATTCC motif within distinct repeat patterns might correlate with disease onset. These findings underscore the need to adapt LRS clinical workflows to fully characterize large repeat expansions at the nucleotide level.

Identifiers

PMID41229449
PMCPMC12604860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.