Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229439›Full record

ReviewPublic health challenges2025

Re-Evaluating Access in Healthcare: Focus on Quality of Care.

Allen M Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Allen M ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology University of California, Irvine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Orange California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-712X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of patients to readily and seamlessly obtain healthcare services is a crucial element of high-quality medical care. Access-defined by the National Academy of Medicine as "the timely use of personal health services to achieve the best health outcome"-directly impacts individual and population health as efforts to optimize access inherently promote well-being and reduce disparities. The link between access and quality is so fundamental to the patient experience that they have become increasingly intertwined as a unified concept. However, due to the sheer complexity of the healthcare system, barriers to access are gradually being recognized as the boundaries among technology, medicine, business, public health, and policy become blurred. The contribution of many human elements, including those stemming from the provider-patient relationship, in optimizing access must also be recognized. Ultimately, improving access requires concerted engagement from a myriad of stakeholders with the goal of prioritizing timely, equitable, personalized, and high-quality care, while empowering patients to take charge of their own health. Although it presents a profound challenge, the journey toward bridging the many gaps is just beginning, and how society re-defines the access imperative in healthcare in an ever-evolving landscape represents one of the foremost issues of the future. This is because access is dependent on ensuring that high-quality, evidence-based healthcare resources are available for everyone. Indeed, the implications for society are tremendous given that access is central to quality of care, profoundly impacts the patient experience, and influences health outcomes. The purpose of this review is to outline the core issues that contribute to this paradigm while focusing on exploring the relationships between access and quality of care.

Indexed as

accessbarriershealth policyinclusionsocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID41229439
PMCPMC12604675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.