Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229403›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025

How Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Perceive Respiratory Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Study to Inform Implementation Efforts.

Jason Ackrivo, Danny Bracy, Lauren B Elman, John Hansen-Flaschen, Zachary Simmons, Piera Pasinelli, Terry Heiman-Patterson, Steven M Kawut, Meghan B Lane-Fall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jason AckrivoDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-1255
Danny BracyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2603-0025
Lauren B ElmanDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-950X
John Hansen-FlaschenDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-7244
Zachary SimmonsDepartment of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University Hershey Medical Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8574-5332
Piera PasinelliDepartment of Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-2707
Terry Heiman-PattersonDepartment of Neurology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-1041
Steven M KawutDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-0608
Meghan B Lane-FallDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that commonly leads to respiratory failure. Early respiratory interventions that may improve symptoms and outcomes are underused when prescribed. We sought to characterize patient perspectives and preferences for respiratory care to enable identification of implementation strategies to improve the uptake of ALS respiratory interventions. Methods: A prospective multicenter mixed-methods observational study was conducted using semistructured interviews of participants recently diagnosed with ALS at 4 academic centers in the United States. Eligible patients were those with an ALS diagnosis in the previous 12 months, forced vital capacity <80% predicted normal, or presence of dyspnea or orthopnea. Results: Twenty-four patients with ALS were interviewed. Ten participants were using some form of respiratory therapy, including 8 using noninvasive ventilation (NIV). The most endorsed factors related to openness to initiate respiratory therapy were a doctor's recommendation and abnormal pulmonary function test results. The most commonly endorsed preferences for learning about a respiratory device included kinesthetic and reading. Descriptions of lung volume recruitment were received with more openness than of NIV. For those not prescribed NIV, reasons for hesitancy to start NIV included fear of mask discomfort, claustrophobia, and lack of perceived benefit. Perceptions about NIV differed in participants identifying as "proactive" rather than "reactive" with their health. Discussion: Patients in the first year after ALS diagnosis have variable receptiveness to respiratory care. These patients place different weights on the factors supporting NIV and may have different educational needs about respiratory interventions. Implementation strategies for respiratory care interventions in ALS should consider patients' motivations for adopting interventions such as NIV, provide multiple educational formats, and identify barriers to incorporating home respiratory care.

Identifiers

PMID41229403
PMCPMC12604821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.