Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229355›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)

Recognizing disability associated with perinatal depression as a precursor of women's rights violations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Ritika Behl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ritika BehlSchool of Legal Studies and Governance, Vidyashilp University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-0809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional disability is concomitantly present in women affected by perinatal depression (PND). PND is not recognized as a public health issue in many countries, especially low- and middle-income countries. This makes it imperative to understand the unique positioning of perinatally depressed women within the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the signatory state's obligations. The present study is an exploratory review that utilizes comparative content analysis to map the manifestation of disability in perinatally depressed women, using the six domains of disability described under the World Health Organization (WHO's) WHODAS 2.0 Manual alongside the findings of epidemiological studies. By adopting the normative juridical method, the provisions of the CRPD were examined in relation to women's unmet perinatal mental health needs, untreated disability, and resulting violation of women's rights. The manifestation forms and consequences of disability associated with maternal PND are multitudinal and multifarious. Perinatal disability resulting from mental health disorders must be recognized as a subject matter under the CRPD. In the absence of laws and policies that address and provide for the management of PND, the signatory States are in breach of their treaty obligations under the CRPD. Policymakers and women's rights protagonists can push for law and policy reforms relating to PND by highlighting the gross violation of the CRPD.

Indexed as

DepressionDepression, PostpartumPersons with DisabilitiesWomen's RightsFemaleHumansPregnancyUnited NationsWorld Health OrganizationCRPDdisabilityhuman rightsperinatal depressionWHODAS 2.0

Identifiers

PMID41229355
PMCPMC12615955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.