Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229344›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025

Acquisition of Spacers from Foreign Prokaryotic Genomes by CRISPR-Cas Systems in Natural Environments.

Katharina Sures, Sarah P Esser, Till L V Bornemann, Carrie J Moore, André R Soares, Julia Plewka, Perla Abigail Figueroa-Gonzalez, S Emil Ruff, Cristina Moraru, Alexander J Probst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katharina SuresEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
Sarah P EsserEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
Till L V BornemannEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
Carrie J MooreEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
André R SoaresEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
Julia PlewkaEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6858-9523
Perla Abigail Figueroa-GonzalezEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
S Emil RuffThe Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
Cristina MoraruEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.
Alexander J ProbstEnvironmental Metagenomics, Research Centre One Health of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9392-6544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems of bacteria and archaea provide immunities against mobile genetic elements, like viruses. In addition, protospacer analyses revealed a very specific acquisition of CRISPR spacers derived from genomes of related species or from closely interacting episymbiont genomes as recently shown for subsurface archaea. However, the origin of most of the spacers that can be found in CRISPR-Cas systems from natural environments has not been deciphered. Here, by analyzing CRISPR-Cas systems of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from two subsurface environments spanning more than 1 Tb of sequencing data, we show that a substantial proportion of CRISPR spacers are acquired from DNA of other prokaryotes inhabiting the same environment. As such, we found that the number of respective spacers can be up to three times higher than the number of self-targeting spacers. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the acquisition of CRISPR spacers from other prokaryotic genomes is partly explained by the relative abundance of the MAG containing the protospacer, as well as by other factors, such as the total number of CRISPR arrays present in a MAG with the respective spacers. Further, we found that spacer acquisition from foreign prokaryotic DNA occurs in almost all types of CRISPR-Cas systems, but shows preferences for subtypes of CRISPR-Cas systems that differ across the investigated ecosystems. Taken together, our results shed new light on the diversity of CRISPR spacers in natural microbial communities and provide an explanation for some of the many unmatched spacers in public databases.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA, IntergenicGenome, ArchaealEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialMetagenomeDNA, IntergenicCRISPR spacermetagenomicspopulation genomicsprotospacer

Identifiers

PMID41229344
PMCPMC12612501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.