Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229299›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

On the mirror test and the evolutionary origin of self-awareness in vertebrates.

Masanori Kohda, Shumpei Sogawa, Redouan Bshary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Conscious birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. The evolutionary functions of consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Personality predicts dispersal and settlement in a novel habitat-a mesocosm experiment.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masanori KohdaDepartment of Biology, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Osaka Prefecture 558-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9598-0088
Shumpei SogawaDepartment of Biology, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Osaka Prefecture 558-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2015-5707
Redouan BsharyDepartment of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7198-8472

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H03872 AND 24K03238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-awareness in animals is often documented by showing evidence for mirror self-recognition (MSR), which is confirmed by the mirror mark-test. The classic assumption about self-awareness was that it is a complex cognitive process, restricted at best to a few large-brained species. Indeed, early MSR research yielded positive results only in great apes, elephants, dolphins and magpies, while most endotherm species failed. However, recent detailed proof of MSR based on a mental representation of self, i.e. private self-awareness (PrSA), in cleaner wrasse

Indexed as

AwarenessBiological EvolutionPerciformesRecognition, PsychologySelf ConceptVertebratesAnimalsfalse-negativesmirror self-recognitionphotograph self-recognitionself-awarenessshared ancestry hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID41229299
PMCPMC12612708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.