Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229287›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

The physiology of interoception and its adaptive role in consciousness.

Jacques Singer, Antonio Damasio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The evolutionary functions of consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacques SingerBrain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-4414-9527
Antonio DamasioBrain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3067-0393

Funding

Funded by the Brain and Creativity Institute Research Funds.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interoceptive nervous system uses signalling mechanisms distinct from those of exteroceptive, voluntary motor, cognitive and linguistic processes. While interoception relies mainly on analogue-like processing, the other systems favour digital-like signalling. This physiological feature allows interoception to map the state of the organism's internal milieu in real time, in stark contrast to the rapid, precise and time-sensitive processing of exteroceptive, proprioceptive, cognitive and linguistic signals. This distinction arises from the unique features of the interoceptive process, namely the unmyelinated and lightly myelinated nature of afferent interoceptive neurons, which facilitates non-synaptic signalling throughout interoceptive pathways, notably in those of the vagus nerve and of neural structures devoid of a blood-brain barrier. We propose that by continuously representing the body's state, spontaneously conscious homoeostatic feelings constitute the foundational substrate of subjectivity and the grounding for consciousness. This idea builds on our prior work, which grounds consciousness in core biology rather than high-level cognition. Consciousness enables adaptive and protective responses that maintain homeostasis and secure life.This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary functions of consciousness'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalConsciousnessInteroceptionAnimalsHumansblood–brain barrierconsciousnessephaptic couplingfeelingshomeostasisinteroceptionmyelinnucleus tractus solitariusvagus nervevolume transmission

Identifiers

PMID41229287
PMCPMC12612705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.