Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229211›Full record

ArticleSmall methods2026

Versatile High-Sensitivity EPR Using Superconducting Spiral Microresonators.

Gediminas Usevičius, Mantas Šimėnas, Blaise L Geoghegan, Oscar W Kennedy, Ignas Pocius, Patrick Hogan, Ana Villanueva Ruiz de Temino, Jean-Baptiste Verstraete, Paulina Verbaitytė, Angeliki Chatziathanasiou and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Gediminas UsevičiusFaculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio 3, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Mantas ŠimėnasFaculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio 3, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Blaise L GeogheganDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Pulse EPR Spectroscopy (PEPR), Imperial College, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, London, W12 0BZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9543-102X
Oscar W KennedyLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.
Ignas PociusFaculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio 3, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Patrick HoganLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.
Ana Villanueva Ruiz de TeminoLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.
Jean-Baptiste VerstraeteLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.
Paulina VerbaitytėFaculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio 3, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Angeliki ChatziathanasiouDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Pulse EPR Spectroscopy (PEPR), Imperial College, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
G Antilen JacobLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.
Mindaugas KamarauskasCenter for Physical Sciences and Technology, Sauletekio 3, Vilnius, LT-10257, Lithuania.
Marius TreiderisCenter for Physical Sciences and Technology, Sauletekio 3, Vilnius, LT-10257, Lithuania.
Paulius GečysCenter for Physical Sciences and Technology, Sauletekio 3, Vilnius, LT-10257, Lithuania.
Joseph AlexanderLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.
Vidmantas KalendraFaculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio 3, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jūras BanysFaculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio 3, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Maxie M RoesslerDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Pulse EPR Spectroscopy (PEPR), Imperial College, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
John J L MortonLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T031425/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W005794/1H2020 European Research Council 771493HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101162021HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101064200Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-A-UEI-23-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is a broadly used technique to study paramagnetic centers in diverse fields ranging from biology to quantum technologies. The availability of well-established commercial instrumentation, including features such as rapid sample exchange, has been a key enabler for EPR to be applied widely across disciplines. Here, a three-order-of-magnitude increase is presented in the spin number sensitivity of the commonly used X-band pulsed EPR while retaining full compatibility with conventional instrumentation and typical sample conditions. This approach employs planar spiral-shaped microresonators with 7 nL mode volumes fabricated from yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) high-temperature superconductor. A wide range of microwave coupling is achieved by a single microresonator inside a conventional EPR tube, loaded into an EPR cavity. The performance of the spiral microresonators is demonstrated through a suite of pulsed EPR experiments on standard samples, including dipolar and hyperfine spectroscopies. By placing a sample within a microfluidic microstructure fabricated to match the mode profile of the microresonator, a high-fidelity spin control is obtained with a spin-number sensitivity of 10

Indexed as

DEEREPR (Electron paramagnetic resonance)microresonatorsensitivity

Identifiers

PMID41229211
PMCPMC13010201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.