ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Deep Learning Image-Based Fusion Approach for Identifying Multiple Apparent Diseases in Concrete Structure.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on Synthetic Data Methods and Detection Models for Micro-Cracks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing the key pain points in detecting typical apparent diseases of concrete structures, where standalone object detection fails to achieve pixel-level quantification and standalone semantic segmentation, is inefficient. Therefore, a deep learning image-based fusion approach is proposed to identify the typical visible diseases in concrete structures, namely crack, spalling, water leakage, and seam deformation. To implement the approach, a deep learning fusion network is developed with the YOLO and UNet models to identify multiple apparent diseases rapidly. In the fusion network, the YOLO model is used to filter the images containing the visible diseases from all the images in the first stage. Then, the UNet model is used to extract the pixels containing diseases from the selected images. Lastly, analysis methods are proposed to quantify the diseases based on the segmented pixels, such as length, width, and area. In this paper, a dataset of 1488 images with the above diseases from a field inspection was used to train the deep learning fusion network. The training results demonstrated the robustness of the fusion network in identifying and segmenting diseases with a mean average precision of 0.72 and a Dice score of 0.82. Experiments were finally conducted on concrete slabs with simulated diseases for additional validation. The results indicated that the proposed fusion network could identify the diseases approximately 50% faster than the UNet model only. The quantification precision was found to be satisfactory, with relative errors below 11.07% for the area of water leakage, below 5% for the length and area of cracks, and below 6% for the width of seams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.